{"id":33352,"date":"2022-05-20T17:09:44","date_gmt":"2022-05-20T22:09:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/?p=33352"},"modified":"2022-05-24T13:27:18","modified_gmt":"2022-05-24T18:27:18","slug":"justice-ketanji-brown-jackson-senate-judiciary-committee-summary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/2022\/05\/20\/justice-ketanji-brown-jackson-senate-judiciary-committee-summary\/","title":{"rendered":"Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Senate Judiciary Committee Summary"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On March 21, the confirmation hearing for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson began as Judge Jackson introduced herself and the 22 Senators on the Judiciary Committee gave their opening statements.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Judge Jackson gave her opening remarks talking about her life and background as a judge stating \u201cI have been a judge for nearly a decade now, and I take that responsibility, and my duty to be independent, very seriously.\u201d&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Democrats on the Committee praised Judge Jackson\u2019s background, with her serving as a public defender, Supreme court clerk, and Federal judge in various courts. New Jersey Senator Cory Booker discussed the historic nature of her nomination (and later confirmation) as the first black woman to be a Supreme Court Justice.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many Republican Senators however brought up past confirmation hearings, especially the Justice Kavanaugh and Barret hearings, exclaiming that Democrats treated the nominees and the Republicans who supported them poorly. Senator Graham stated that her hearing \u201cwon\u2019t be a circus\u201d. Some senators also criticized liberal groups that supported her, claiming that those groups had a significant role in her nomination. Many foreshadowed questions on critical race theory, court-packing, and her previous sentencing decisions that were to come.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The second day of Judge Jackson\u2019s hearings was filled with many questions that lasted for 13 hours. There was much controversy on this day of the hearing, as Republican committee members asked a variety of questions ranging from critical race theory, her previous sentencing records, gender identity, and her opinion on court-packing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley questioned Jackson&#8217;s sentencing record in cases related to child pornography, claiming that she is sympathetic to sex offenders. Judge Jackson\u2019s rebuttal to his claims, notes that judges have to determine how to sentence defendants consistent with the requirements that Congress has set forward. It is important to note that Senator Hawley has previously confirmed three Supreme Court justices that have given sentences below the recommended minimum but did not press this issue with them. She further explained that she takes these cases very seriously and encourages Congress to make updated laws and clearer guidelines for these cases.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another issue that came up was her opinion on court-packing to expand the number of Justices on the Supreme Court Bench to which she said, &#8220;In my view, judges should not be speaking to political issues and certainly not a nominee for a position on the Supreme Court,&#8221; This neutral stance by Judge Jackson reinforced that this issue would not be hers or any judges decision, but the decision of lawmakers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Later on, the topic of critical race theory came up as Texas Senator Ted Cruz attempted to link Jackson with critical race theory, despite her repeated statements that academic theories &#8220;[do not] come up in my work as a judge.&#8221; Cruz then brought up blown-up displays of books used at Georgetown Day School, where Jackson serves on the board of trustees, such as <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Antiracist Baby<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> which he states is &#8220;overflowing&#8221; with Critical Race Theory, and asked her if thought babies were racist Jackson explains to Senator Cruz that the board of trustees doesn&#8217;t control the books that are taught, further citing that \u201cI do not believe that any child should be made to feel as though they are racist, or as though they are not valued, or as though they are less than, that they are victims, that they are oppressors \u2014 I don\u2019t believe in any of that.\u201d The book that Cruz claimed taught that babies were racist does not teach this and sales of the book significantly increased after the hearing.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Questions about her stance on gender identity came up when Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn asked Judge Jackson to provide the definition of a woman. To which Judge Jackson responded, \u201cI\u2019m not a biologist\u201d. While Judge Jackson\u2019s answer was neutral, Senator Blackburn condemned her response.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Finally, the hearing turned to Judge Jackson&#8217;s record as a public defender. She responded to concerns about her record as a public defender, specifically for Guantanamo Bay detainees, explaining that public defenders &#8220;don&#8217;t get to pick their clients.&#8221; Jackson further stated previous decisions based on the Consitution stated &#8220;We&#8217;re entitled to be treated fairly. That&#8217;s what makes our system the best in the world. That&#8217;s what makes us exemplary.&#8221; It is important to note that Judge Jackson\u2019s confirmation to the Supreme Court makes her the first to be a previous public defender.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On the third day of the Senate hearings, Judge Jackson sat through 10 hours of extensive questions that focused on how she judges her cases, controversial topics, and more questions about previous sentencing decisions.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">When asked by Senator Cruz, judge Jackson stated that if confirmed she would recuse herself from the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">S<\/span><\/i><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">tudents for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">a case challenging Affirmative Action, since she sits on the Board of Overseers, which would be a conflict of interest.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">During Senator Cory Booker\u2019s questioning time, he took a moment to acknowledge that Judge Jackson\u2019s confirmation to the Supreme court would be a historical moment. He also criticized how the type of questions the Republican senators were asking her. He shed a few tears while referencing his mom and other family members stating\u201c I see my ancestors in yours. \u2026Nobody&#8217;s gonna steal that joy.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On the final day of the confirmation hearings, witnesses were brought in from the American Bar Association and U.S House Representative Joyce Beaty on behalf of Judge Jackson. While Alabama general attorney spoke against Judge Jackson\u2019s confirmation. The day wrapped up with congratulations for Ketanji Brown Jackson and her impressive record.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On April 4, her nomination was advanced to the Senate by the Senate Judiciary Committee on a partisan vote of 11-11, since the Democrats have control of the Senate, Judge Jackson\u2019s nomination went to the Senate floor.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On April 7, Ketanji Brown Jackson was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on a 53-47 vote, with all Democrats plus Senators Mitt Romeny, Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins voting in favor and the remaining Republicans voting against.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On March 21, the confirmation hearing for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson began as Judge Jackson introduced herself and the 22 Senators on the Judiciary Committee&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":459,"featured_media":33714,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1019],"tags":[3835,1535,2968],"coauthors":[3218],"class_list":["post-33352","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-imsanews","tag-judge-jackson","tag-senate","tag-supreme-court"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/459"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33352"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33352\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33597,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33352\/revisions\/33597"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33352"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=33352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}