{"id":38770,"date":"2024-02-08T13:25:54","date_gmt":"2024-02-08T19:25:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/?p=38770"},"modified":"2024-02-08T13:25:54","modified_gmt":"2024-02-08T19:25:54","slug":"colorado-and-maine-rule-to-remove-trump-from-primary-ballot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/2024\/02\/08\/colorado-and-maine-rule-to-remove-trump-from-primary-ballot\/","title":{"rendered":"Colorado And Maine Rule to Remove Trump From Primary Ballot"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In a groundbreaking decision, the Colorado Supreme Court has disqualified President Donald Trump from appearing on the state\u2019s 2024 ballot.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This decision was based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, stating that, \u201c<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">No person shall\u2026 hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath,&#8230; as an officer of the United States,&#8230; to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.\u201d <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Colorado\u2019s decision says that they found Trump\u2019s actions during the Capitol Riots of January 6th engaged in insurrection, which therefore concludes that \u201cPresident Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three; because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Secretary to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This decision reversed a Denver district judge\u2019s prior determination that Section 3 of Amendment 14 did not apply to the presidency.&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Legal experts and scholars are divided about this decision. Mirroring the public sentiment, Colorado\u2019s Supreme Court was split as well, resulting in a 4-3 decision.&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the majority opinion, the Colorado Supreme Court wrote, \u201cWe do not reach these conclusions lightly. We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory, and that this case presents several issues of first impression.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The dissenting opinion argued that <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">the section of Colorado&#8217;s election code under question &#8220;was not enacted to decide whether a candidate engaged in insurrection,\u201d and that&nbsp; \u201cOur government cannot deprive someone of the right to hold public office without due process of law\u2026 The decision\u2026 flies in the face of the due process doctrine.\u201d <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The opinion reflects the thoughts of people who disapprove of the decision. According to them, Election codes cannot determine if a crime occurred or not. If Trump was not found convicted of insurrection, then the 14th Amendment shouldn\u2019t apply.&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On the other side, supporters of the decision say that the 14th Amendment is \u201cself-executing.\u201d The amendment doesn\u2019t specify how the judgment of if an insurrection took place should be determined\u2013 such as through the court of law or impeachment hearings\u2013 just that an elected official can\u2019t engage in an insurrection.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Regardless of the political debate on constitutional interpretation, the decision was slated to be upheld until January 4th, 2024, just one day before Colorado\u2019s deadline to certify the presidential primary ballot.&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On January 3rd, Trump formally asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse Colorado\u2019s ruling, which the Supreme Court accepted the next day.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The case will be heard on February 8th, nearly a month before the Colorado primary on March 5th.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On December 28th, Maine\u2019s Secretary of State Shenna Bellows disqualified Trump from the primary election using the same constitutional clause. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201c<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">I am mindful that no secretary of state has ever deprived a presidential candidate of ballot access based on section 3 of the 14th amendment,\u201d Bellows said. \u201c I am also mindful, however, that no presidential candidate has ever before engaged in insurrection.\u201d <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Similar to the events in Colorado, people in disagreement with the decisions are arguing that the decisions reek of election interference, particularly because Bellows is a Democrat, and both Colorado and Maine are Democratic-leaning states.&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As expected, Trump also appealed Maine\u2019s Secretary of State\u2019s decision on January 2nd. Like the Colorado decision, it will go up to the highest court. Ultimately, that decision will decide the issue nationally.&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">While a ruling or decision cannot be predicted at this time, the US Supreme Court is leaning conservative, including three of the nine justices on the court that were nominated by Trump.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">These decisions are poised to significantly impact the 2024 presidential elections, potentially affecting electoral votes even in traditionally left-leaning states such as Maine. For example, Biden won three of Maine\u2019s electoral votes in 2020 and Trump won one.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a groundbreaking decision, the Colorado Supreme Court has disqualified President Donald Trump from appearing on the state\u2019s 2024 ballot.&nbsp; This decision was based on&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":920,"featured_media":38805,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1019],"tags":[1980,1157,1234],"coauthors":[4236],"class_list":["post-38770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-imsanews","tag-elections","tag-news","tag-politics"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38770"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38770\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38981,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38770\/revisions\/38981"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38805"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38770"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=38770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}