{"id":8194,"date":"2012-12-08T13:19:58","date_gmt":"2012-12-08T13:19:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/?p=8194"},"modified":"2013-01-19T20:46:22","modified_gmt":"2013-01-19T20:46:22","slug":"nfl-power-rankings-week-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/2012\/12\/08\/nfl-power-rankings-week-14\/","title":{"rendered":"NFL Power Rankings: Week 14"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The end of the season is similar to the end of the semester for IMSA students. Like us, teams have to struggle through fatigue. Also like us, they have different goals in mind based on where they are in the standings. The top ranked teams have to keep up their standards of excellence in order to prepare themselves for the playoffs. The teams in wild card contention are like a student with an 89. They are so close to their goal and cannot afford many more mistakes. The teams at the bottom are struggling to find motivation to finish out the year strong. It is a tall order but, like us IMSA students, NFL teams always find a way to finish out the year with some positives. \u2013 Agnel (writes for the odd-ranked teams)<\/p>\n<p>The playoff picture is red-hot. These are the most exciting weeks before the postseason.\u00a0 We can watch our teams shine, make our bold Super Bowl prediction, and cheer on our fantasy teams.\u00a0 In the AFC, the Patriots, Ravens, and Broncos are tied at 9-3, fighting for a first round bye.\u00a0 The Steelers and the Bengals are still in competition for a 6<sup>th<\/sup> seed wildcard.\u00a0 The NFC race is less polar, with the Seahawks, followed by the Buccaneers, Vikings, Redskins, and Cowboys.\u00a0 The Redskins or Cowboys could even win their division, both with records of 6-6, behind the 7-5 Giants.\u00a0 The Bears and Packers are tied in record for the North\u2019s title.\u00a0 Not much is set in stone and the difference will be made by your cheering and good-luck rituals. Why else would my mom scream at the Bears\u2019 game and wear her \u201clucky shirt\u201d every game day? \u2013 Mason (writes for the even-ranked teams)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>M: Mason\u2019s Rank<\/p>\n<p>A: Agnel\u2019s Rank<\/p>\n<p>NOTE: \u201cLast Week\u201d refers to the rankings from two weeks ago.<\/p>\n<p>1.\u00a0Texans (11-1) Last Week: 1 (M: 1, A: 1)<\/p>\n<p>Solid win over the Titans leaves them with a good taste in their mouths going into the Monday night showdown with the Patriots. I believe this game determines who the favorite in the AFC is and the Texans will have their hands full.<\/p>\n<p>2. Falcons (11-1) Last Week: 3 (M: 2, A: 2)<\/p>\n<p>The Falcons still have just one loss, but the coming games still matter.\u00a0 The teams they played also have just a .389 win percentage, the lowest in the league.<\/p>\n<p>3. Packers (8-4) Last Week: 2 (M: 3, A: 3)<\/p>\n<p>They have the same record as the Colts with a far superior team. I\u2019m not sold on this defense but their offense has recovered nicely after their sluggish start.<\/p>\n<p>4. Patriots (9-3) Last Week: 7 (M: 4, A: 4)<\/p>\n<p>The Patriots have their two best opponents of the year the next two weeks, the Texans and 49ers, both at home, previously playing only the Broncos and Ravens.<\/p>\n<p>5. Broncos (9-3) Last Week: 8 (M: 5, A: 6)<\/p>\n<p>They have a league high seven-game winning streak which looks like it will continue this week against Oakland. Baltimore looms large on the horizon, however.<\/p>\n<p>6. 49ers (8-3-1) Last Week: 4 (M: 7, A: 5)<\/p>\n<p>Isn\u2019t it crazy that the Seahawks have beaten the Patriots, Packers, and Bears? On the other hand, the 49ers have beaten the Seahawks, Packers, Bears, and Saints.\u00a0 The only team that has given the 49ers trouble is the Rams. 2<sup>nd<\/sup> in rushing yards, 2<sup>nd<\/sup> fewest opposing passing yards, and 3<sup>rd<\/sup> fewest opposing rushing yards.<\/p>\n<p>7. Bears (8-4) Last Week: 6 (M: 6, A: 7)<\/p>\n<p>Last week showed exactly the kind of game the Bears cannot win. A game against a somewhat competent offense and a really good defense.<\/p>\n<p>8. Ravens (9-3) Last Week: 5 (M: 8, A: 8)<\/p>\n<p>The oldest non-kicker in the league, Charlie Batch, beat you?\u00a0 He\u2019s so old, he\u2019s out there hobbling around with a walker!<\/p>\n<p>9. Giants (7-5) Last Week: 9 (M: 9, A: 10)<\/p>\n<p>After that statement win against the Packers, they fell horribly flat against the Redskins. Time will tell if that loss proves important in the playoff picture, but right now I believe more in RGIII than in Eli Manning.<\/p>\n<p>10. Bengals (7-5) Last Week: 14 (M: 11, A: 9)<\/p>\n<p>The Bengals so far: loss, 3-game winning streak, 4-game losing streak, and now a 4-game winning streak.\u00a0 The Bengals are so true to winning and losing the games they\u2019re expected to.<\/p>\n<p>11. Seahawks (7-5) Last Week: 12 (M: 13, A: 11)<\/p>\n<p>While people are busy talking about Andrew Luck and RGIII, they cannot afford to forget Russell Wilson. He has tremendously overachieved in Seattle and looks to be the franchise quarterback for years to come.<\/p>\n<p>12. Colts (8-4) Last Week: 17 (M: 12, A: 12)<\/p>\n<p>The Lions are officially the saltiest team in the NFL, with everyone who has played the Seahawks closely behind.\u00a0 Andrew Luck leads two touchdown drives for a last-chance fourth quarter comeback. \u00a0This Rookie of the Year contest is too close.<\/p>\n<p>13. Buccaneers (6-6) Last Week: 11 (M: 10, A: 15)<\/p>\n<p>With the Redskins hot on their tail of the Wild Card in the NFC, I don\u2019t see enough from this team to pull out a playoff berth.<\/p>\n<p>14. Steelers (7-5) Last Week: 10 (M: 15, A: 13)<\/p>\n<p>That game was just garbage and it shows more about the Ravens than the Steelers.<\/p>\n<p>15. Redskins (6-6) Last Week: 23 (M: 14, A: 14)<\/p>\n<p>They are my pick to win the NFC East now. Whether or not they can do anything in the postseason is a different story but they can definitely overtake the Giants.<\/p>\n<p>16. Rams (5-6-1) Last Week: 21 (M: 17, A: 16)<\/p>\n<p>The Rams seem to know how to play the 49ers, as they have beat them in the last game and tied them the first time.<\/p>\n<p>17. Saints (5-7) Last Week: 13 (M: 16, A: 18)<\/p>\n<p>Although I am quite fond of the Saints as a football team, I must say that they are done as far as the playoffs go.<\/p>\n<p>18. Cowboys (6-6) Last Week: 15 (M: 14, A: 21)<\/p>\n<p>The Cowboys are at .500 but they could lose the rest of their games this year.\u00a0 Either way, the NFC East will only have one playoff team this season.<\/p>\n<p>19. Vikings (6-6) Last Week: 16 (M: 19, A: 21)<\/p>\n<p>Adrian Peterson keeps running and the Vikings keep losing. So unfortunate because this has been a truly special season for him.<\/p>\n<p>20. Dolphins (5-7) Last Week: 22 (M: 22\u00a0 A: 19)<\/p>\n<p>While their playoff hopes may be gone, the Dolphins can still try to make a statement against the 49ers or the Patriots this year.<\/p>\n<p>21. Lions (4-8) Last Week: 18 (M: 20, A: 22)<\/p>\n<p>This team just cannot catch a break.<\/p>\n<p>22. Bills (5-7) Last Week: 20 (M: 23, A: 20)<\/p>\n<p>The Bills could win a few more games this year, but at this point, why try? Tank for draft picks and a better future.<\/p>\n<p>23. Chargers (4-8) Last Week: 19 (M: 21, A: 23)<\/p>\n<p>Too bad. So much talent on a team and the best they can do is finish 8-8. They are like the Eagles of last year. Come to think of it, they are like the Eagles of this year, too.<\/p>\n<p>24. Browns (4-8) Last Week: 27 (M: 24, A: 25)<\/p>\n<p>The season was over after week 5, but the Browns defense and run game are just getting started.<\/p>\n<p>25. Titans (4-8) Last Week: 24 (M: 26, A: 24)<\/p>\n<p>There is no shame in losing to the Texans. There is shame in committing six turnovers, however.<\/p>\n<p>26. Eagles (3-9) Last Week: 26 (M: 25, A: 28)<\/p>\n<p>The Eagles are so bad, but they are above the teams below them because they have a tendency to score on accident.<\/p>\n<p>27. Jaguars (2-10) Last Week: 30 (M: 28, A: 26)<\/p>\n<p>They just got ran over like road kill in last week\u2019s game against the Bills. On the bright side, they held Ryan Fitzpatrick to only 112 \u00a0passing yards.<\/p>\n<p>28. Panthers (3-9) Last Week: 28 (M: 27, A: 27)<\/p>\n<p>The loss to the Chiefs justifies this position. I don\u2019t care if the Panthers think they are better than the Falcons.\u00a0 Their win-loss record is still better than their coin toss record.<\/p>\n<p>29. Jets (5-7) Last Week: 29 (M: 29, A: 30)<\/p>\n<p>Mark Sanchez was finally benched but, instead of Tim Tebow, the Jets inserted Greg McElroy and won the game.<\/p>\n<p>30. Cardinals (4-8) Last Week: 25 (M: 31, A: 29)<\/p>\n<p>This team beat the Patriots?\u00a0 The Cardinals could not beat the Jets.<\/p>\n<p>31. Chiefs (2-10) Last Week: 32 (M: 30, A: 31)<\/p>\n<p>Truly a much needed win for this hurting franchise. The loss of Jovan Belcher, who committed suicide in front of team officials, put into perspective how insignificant football is.<\/p>\n<p>32. Raiders (3-9) Last Week: 31 (M: 32, A: 32)<\/p>\n<p>Maybe the return of McFadden will snap the five-game losing streak, but not this week as they travel to Denver.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The end of the season is similar to the end of the semester for IMSA students. Like us, teams have to struggle through fatigue. Also&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":8198,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1019],"tags":[1052,1106,1483],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-8194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-imsanews","tag-nfl","tag-power-rankings","tag-week-14"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8194"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8194\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8660,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8194\/revisions\/8660"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8198"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8194"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.imsa.edu\/acronym\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=8194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}