“She Got In Because She’s A Girl”

The class of 2018 sports their university gear on commit day! Source: IMSA CAC Connect Facebook

I dreaded the college application season as a junior because of my sex. I knew that in a year, I might face the invalidation that comes with getting accepted by a school my male counterparts are deferred or rejected by. When early action and early decision results came out in December, I saw memes made about how disadvantaged the boys at IMSA, and boys in general, were in the college admissions process. While I watched intelligent girls announce their acceptances to Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Johns Hopkins, and other amazing institutions, my heart swelled with excitement for them. Yet, at the same time, I couldn’t help but wonder if their sex actually did give them a leg up in the college admissions process. 

Nationwide, research has shown that certain schools do favor female applicants over male applicants, but other schools favor male applicants over female applicants. Male applicants tend to be favored at liberal arts schools, whereas technological institutes favor female applicants. These preferences may stem from long-running stereotypes which discourage men from participating in the humanities and women from participating in STEM. 

When I looked at the divide of acceptances between males and females at the academy, I found that girls tended to gather more acceptances each year. In the past 8 years, of every acceptance letter received, more than 50% fell into the hands of a female. 

Visit https://plot.ly/~sverma1/29/ if the above chart doesn’t work. This graph is interactive! Mouse over points to learn more about them, double click legend entries to isolate them, and drag over an area you’re interested in to zoom-in on it. 

However, the data was skewed: girls tended to submit far more applications than boys during the years where the acceptance rates spiked in their favor. In years where there were more male applicants than female applicants, the overall acceptance rates tended to be almost equivalent, but in years where female applicants outnumbered male applicants, the overall acceptance rates tilted in the favor of females. However, this is to be expected due to the vast difference in application numbers during some of these application cycles. 

Visit https://plot.ly/~sverma1/36/ if the above chart doesn’t work.

For this reason, all acceptance rates calculated in this article will be taken from the population of the sex from which the applicant belongs to. This will provide a better picture of the acceptance rates in relation to the number of applications. From the chart below, there’s an obvious shift in acceptances in the year 2014. Female applicants saw an increase in the overall acceptance rates while male applicants saw a decrease. 

Visit https://plot.ly/~sverma1/23/#/ if the above chart doesn’t work.

The buzz I heard surrounding sex and college admissions occurred during the Early Admissions season, a season where many seniors apply to their favorite school in the hope that the increased acceptance rate will work in their favor. It’s widely known that different application types draw in different amounts of applicants, and therefore varying acceptance rates. 

Visit https://plot.ly/~sverma1/27 if the above chart doesn’t work.

During most years, female applicants experienced higher acceptance rates in almost every single category of application. With the exception of the Early Decision acceptance rate showing extreme amounts of fluctuation throughout the years, the general trend has remained the same since 2011. 

These analyses are extremely general, and they don’t take into account which schools the applicants were applying to, or the applicants’ credentials. Although it’s impossible to control for the applicants’ credentials without revealing private information, it is possible to control for the schools which applicants applied to. I’ve chosen to analyze a few of the most popular schools which IMSA students have applied to in the past eight years. 

First, the IMSA student’s favorite school, the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. The IMSA acceptance rate to UIUC is already high and typically doesn’t cause a large amount of discourse within the senior class, but it also promises the largest sample size of IMSA students. 

Visit https://plot.ly/~sverma1/31 if the above chart doesn’t work.

Disclaimer: This data also does not correct for the different majors which students may have applied to. 

The above data shows that the University of Illinois hasn’t tended to favor either girls or boys in their acceptances. In 2013, the acceptance for both boys and girls was 100%, but in 2011 and 2015, the acceptance rate was higher for females. In 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2018, the acceptance rate was higher for males. Even with these disparities, the differences are minimal enough to be considered negligible most years. Each year, both populations saw an acceptance rate of over 90%. 

Next is Case Western Reserve University, which provides the option of applying Early Action or applying Regular Decision. Female applicants have tended to dominate both the Early Action and Regular decision acceptances throughout the past 8 years with occasional inconsistencies, one of which can be seen in the 2016 cycle. 

Visit https://plot.ly/~sverma1/33 if the above chart doesn’t work.

Northwestern University offers the opportunity to apply as either Early Decision, a binding application plan, or Regular Decision. Throughout the past 8 years, there are no clear trends in the IMSA application acceptance patterns to Northwestern University. Some years, females lead the Early Decision or Regular Decision acceptances, and others none of them are accepted. During most years, the regular decision acceptance rates were relatively similar. 

Visit https://plot.ly/~sverma1/25/#/ if the above chart doesn’t work.

Because these conclusions didn’t account for female and male stereotypes, I chose to compare two Universities right next to each other in Boston. Harvard, a liberal arts university, follows the general random pattern seen in Northwestern, another liberal arts university, whereas the Massachusettes Institute for Technology saw a decrease in male acceptances and an increase in female acceptances over the years. This trend follows those found nationwide

Visit https://plot.ly/~sverma1/38 if the above chart doesn’t work.

Although sex may play a role in college admissions, those applying to college have no way of preventing their admissions counselors from accepting them based on their sex. Each applicant puts hard work into both their application and their entire high school career. The role of sex in college admissions cannot counteract a weak application, and it cannot overpower an extremely strong one. While college decision season is a tense period in seniors’ lives, remember that each applicant worked just as hard as you did, and their admissions are valid. 

About the Author

Shubhi Verma
Shubha "Shubhi" Verma is from a small village called Forsyth, Illinois, but at IMSA she lives in 02b downquad with her favorite people. She's thrilled to be serving as Co Editor-in-Chief this year for the Acronym, and she looks forward to spending even more time procrastinating homework by working on this. Outside of this Wordpress, she's a part of BELLAs, LEAD, Science Olympiad, Senior Class Club, and SIR, so you'll be able to find her trudging underneath her 50lb backpack a lot. Ask her about the Acronym if you want her to launch into a 2 hour speech about why you should join and why it's the absolute best organization on campus.

1 Comment on "“She Got In Because She’s A Girl”"

  1. According to US News & Report, females made up 56% of the enrollment at colleges, often higher at liberal arts schools (LAC). To boost their numbers, LACs preferentially admit male applicants at higher rate. But at elite STEMs with endemic female deficit, such as CalTech and MIT, admit female applicants at far better odds to reduce the gender gap.
    In short, if you are an under-represented gender for a college and get admitted with a disparately lesser merits in SAT/ACT, then yeah, “SHE GOT IN BECAUSE SHE’S A GIRL” applies.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.